Post by account_disabled on Mar 13, 2024 3:10:16 GMT -6
Legislate on what is necessary, what it contributes, what advances the freedom of citizens or reinforces the socioeconomic base that makes the exercise of those rights possible. It's the rule. And naturally, “regulatoryism” is rejectable. The “legis-ragia”. Legislate for the sake of legislating. This legislation comes, in my opinion, first of all from what I call the “Alonso Martínez complex” that jurists and legislators suffer from. The irrepressible desire to have your name printed in the Official Gazette that corresponds to the end of the Civil Code or any other norm. It is a complex that recalls the passion of teenagers to have their selfies shown on social networks.
He also participates in the “bossy syndrome,” the uncontrollable desire to command that anyone gets when, for example, they put on a flat cap. Imagine those of the one who is named “legislator”. In the times of our recent confinement, from the first to the last step of the administrative hierarchy they found a good opportunity AOL Email List to write and publish hundreds, thousands of Instructions, Circulars, etc. telling his subordinates what is fair and exactly what they should do at all times, day after day. Clarifying, rectifying, expanding, innovating previous Instructions and Circulars. From the same day. In a surprised conversation between two officials about one of these instructions.
Don't worry, don't worry because between now and twelve at night he will dictate three or four more!” Secondly, the legislation comes from the fact that this is a country of non-compliance, a country in which the words “or carry a lit cigarette” must be added to the smoking ban signs. And if the pet is allowed to walk, it must be clarified that neither chickens nor stuffed animals are allowed. For the smart ones. Here we must prohibit by objective extension. But also with personal concreteness. No one is taken for granted if the rule does not address one with a first and last name. And all this results in norms proliferating, the legal system being a regulatory jungle, a complicated and prolix reality. Which in turn affects the general non-compliance with the rules. I am not saying that specialized regulations are not necessary for special realities in which it is necessary to guarantee special protection.
He also participates in the “bossy syndrome,” the uncontrollable desire to command that anyone gets when, for example, they put on a flat cap. Imagine those of the one who is named “legislator”. In the times of our recent confinement, from the first to the last step of the administrative hierarchy they found a good opportunity AOL Email List to write and publish hundreds, thousands of Instructions, Circulars, etc. telling his subordinates what is fair and exactly what they should do at all times, day after day. Clarifying, rectifying, expanding, innovating previous Instructions and Circulars. From the same day. In a surprised conversation between two officials about one of these instructions.
Don't worry, don't worry because between now and twelve at night he will dictate three or four more!” Secondly, the legislation comes from the fact that this is a country of non-compliance, a country in which the words “or carry a lit cigarette” must be added to the smoking ban signs. And if the pet is allowed to walk, it must be clarified that neither chickens nor stuffed animals are allowed. For the smart ones. Here we must prohibit by objective extension. But also with personal concreteness. No one is taken for granted if the rule does not address one with a first and last name. And all this results in norms proliferating, the legal system being a regulatory jungle, a complicated and prolix reality. Which in turn affects the general non-compliance with the rules. I am not saying that specialized regulations are not necessary for special realities in which it is necessary to guarantee special protection.